143 Comments

That Ben Shapiro doesn’t know that in this instance “politics” is plural (a certain set of beliefs) means he’s even dumber than I thought.

Expand full comment
Dec 28, 2022·edited Dec 28, 2022

Ben Shapiro's would-be toughguy rhetoric is meant to do one thing and one thing only: distract from the fact that he kneels before anti-Semites and neo-Nazis because he's too weak, cowardly and afraid to stand up to them.

Expand full comment
Dec 28, 2022·edited Dec 28, 2022

I look at Ben Shapiro, and my thought is "Karma will find you, little boy...because she always does". A few years ago, Ben Shapiro said younger voters found Donald Trump "mean and nasty", and that would ultimately turn them away. Turns out, he was right. In a delicious irony, Shapiro himself has turned "mean and nasty"...and it is really not going to age well. Ben Shapiro puts out a lot of nastiness and negativity--the Lizzo episode (he showed he may have a certain level of bias against African Americans)...the nastiness he spews at Americans of a gay persuasion...I could go on, but I won't. All I will say is that he should check his karmic balance, since the lady got in some wicked responses over the years--Terry Dolan and how he paid for his years of gay bashing in right wing politics...Rush Limbaugh, who spent decades spewing noxious gas, only to ultimately die from noxious gas...I could go on, but I won't.

Since Ben Shapiro seems to like clichés, here's one for him--"You reap what you sow, b*tch"...

Expand full comment

On immigration- the GOP clearly wants the problem vastly more than they want the solution. In my industry we need 133K vet techs in the next 8 or so years. In 8 years, statistically, we will ALSO have 100% turnover. If we don't have the kids of the folks crossing the borders coming to work in our vet hospitals at all levels 75MM pets will go unseen. Given that most of the agents of bioterrorism are diseases with an animal host...this is an issue.

Human health is just as bad.

But solving this would require governing. To do that, the GOP would need to go back to pretending to care.

Expand full comment

Corporations are soulless entities that do whatever they think is best for this quarter and (maybe) the next quarter... far thinking corporations look ahead maybe a year. They respond to market pressures--expressed either through sales or through public media (be it social or other).

Moreso than any other human or human entity, they act out of rationalized self-interest, based upon the data available to them (not always well or competently, of course).

While they do a lot to try and shape public perception of themselves (branding, marketing, etc), like most institutions that are dependent upon people choosing to pay them money, they are slaves to the market.

They are neither woke nor reactionary.. nor actually much of anything politically (other than pro-policies that will benefit them--and they don't care which side they come from).

Disney is in the entertainment business, which is even more fickle and public dependent than a lot of other businesses. Buying Disney is purely elective. It isn't like buying food or gas or physical products that you need to live or work. Entertainment tends to be far more aware of and far more concerned with pleasing the largest and most profitable market segments--and that is NOT the people living in the Villages, or in Outer Podunk Montana.

Entertainment (and the arts, in general) also has a history of attracting and employing people who are, for lack of a better term, non-traditional culturally and socially--and so there is an interest in protecting that, as well.

The GoP is engaged in trying to hold back a tsunami with stacked rolls of toilet paper. They will see some short term successes in places, but this will only exacerbate the situation in the larger context and is highly likely to generate downstream consequences that they are not equipped to deal with. While they are a reactionary party, reaction begets a reaction of its own.

Expand full comment

Shadenfreude is the word I think we are looking for here. Spite is their only policy. If they get that, then even if they die of covid-19 or fentanyl addiction, they'll pass on with the knowledge that, boy! Did they ever own the libs!

Expand full comment

I think Disney's response had less to do with political correctness and more to do with signaling to one of their major consumer groups that they still want their business and so do not discriminate. Duh!

Being a politician who knows nothing about supply and demand and free capitalism, DeSantis had no idea why Disney would not join him in gay bashing.

Expand full comment

Maybe, just maybe folks should do a read of the Third Reich in Germany and exactly how they came into power. It was a well thought out plan over several years.

I have no problem seeing Ron DeSantis wearing a Brownshirt,

with his minions destroying the

Nation and government, one brick

of our Constitution at a time.

Expand full comment

Is it any wonder that the New Republicans want to talk personality instead of policy? Red meat for them now apparently is a word salad of “woke,” “drag queen,” and “immigrants,” meanwhile avoiding the crux of the governing philosophy which is solidly authoritarian dressed to resemble libertarianism. DeSantis is just hoeing the row that was laid out even before TFG.

Expand full comment
founding

Considering Abbot et al's anemic long-term response to that little winter power outage they had down there in the Lone Star a while back, his lack of concern for the warmth and welfare of a bus load of non-citizens is of no surprise and to be completely expected, since he has little of that even for the American citizens of the Great State of Texas.

With Greg and his buds, no reminder is needed that the cruelty is the point, at least when it comes to folks who come from points south of his border. But I'm not sure what the point is in his lack of concern for the southerners living in his own state. Oh. Wait. It would cost serious $$ for Texas utilities to become really dependable in severe winter storms, and they'd have to give up a bit of their "energy independence" to do it. And maybe spending those $$ might mean less $$ for them to contribute to Greg and his crew? And hey, those kind of things... they don't really come along all that often, do they? And they really aren't all that bad. That last little blow...what was it called...Uri? It only cost, what, about 150 or 160 lives? Not much of a price to pay for those utilities' help with keeping the lights on in his administration, eh?

I'd like to say here that the point is that Abbot and his kind are...well I can't say it, not with the words that would be appropriate. Charlie and the B are pretty tolerant about language here. But even they have their limits.

Expand full comment

Perhaps the only thing in this story more disturbing than DeSantis' vengeance/revenge/payback-based political system is the fact that so many ordinary voters, who consider themselves pro-democracy and pro-rule of law, see no problem with it.

Read any tweet that calls out DeSantis' retaliation against businesses, cities, and individuals that open their mouths against his policies as the proto-authoritarianism it is, and you'll see a torrent of comments below them--not all of them from Republicans--either pooh-poohing the notion, or making vaguely menacing taunts toward the tweeter as to what a "President DeSantis" will do to them (and of course, the tweeter will "deserve" it).

There's a couple things going on here.

One--Although voters have more or less gotten over Donald Trump, a critical number of them haven't stopped despising the other party enough to latch onto somebody (anybody) who promises to smite them and make their voters cry.

That person, for the time being, is DeSantis--and until he proves to be an election-loser, they will justify any fool thing he does, up to and including open tyranny. (As opposed to the soft, Orbanist quasi-tyranny he appears to be attempting to build in Florida.)

Two--Although Donald Trump is likely an indicted man walking, he has awakened and underlined a zeitgeist of vengeance/revenge/payback among the populace. To a substantial chunk of America, vengeance, retalitation, gloating over the ruined cities of your enemies (etc.) is all that matters in politics.

You see it in behavior beyond mere politics, from Elon Musk to celebrity nonsense. Too many of us are too bored and narcissistic not to fall into it.

Expand full comment

I understand that ideological labels are always oversimplifications, but the word "populist" has a long and honorable pedigree in American politics. We should never forget that there are really "left populists" and "right populists" today. Granted, the historic populist movement had elements of both, but that's always the case with political parties in our constitutional democracy. The two labels are much more clearly distinguished at present. Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro are right populists; Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are left populists. Let's not confuse the two camps.

Expand full comment

Great piece by Mona on immigration -- again. She's right on so many points. In a sense, she's stating the obvious: immigration policy isn't rocket science, other countries have solved it and we're the laggards. But it all bears repeating until the responsible -- and even more, the irresponsible -- people in Washington start listening.

Expand full comment

Prediction: The more our future "elected leaders" behave and look like Trump, DeSantis, Lake & Co., the more likely the preferred course of regime change will be sudden death. They've brought it on themselves, in large part thanks to the dissemination of so many military-style weapons as though they were so much bubblegum. That, and they're innate hatred of "others."

Expand full comment

As a modest student of history, I keep wondering how many people in Texas (including Mr. Abbott) who complain about their location, and the number of migrants there, realize that we took Texas away from Mexico (see: Annexation of Texas, 1845). Maybe the migrants have a justification to come to where the land once was rightfully theirs. Sending them elsewhere and claiming that our own territorial expansion remains inviolable seems at least a wee tad contradictory in that light.

Expand full comment

To DeSantis' anti-capitalist actions you can add his imperial edict that companies cannot require employees or customers to have been vaccinated. Competition is supposed to be at the heart of free enterprise. Companies that require vaccinations should be able to compete against companies that don't. Both types of companies would appeal to some customers. That's competition.

Expand full comment