There's not much to see here honestly. Biden has a 43% approval rating. Terry ran a bad campaign that was more or less a re-run the 2016 Clinton Campaign, IE: "Trump Trump Trump!"' except Youngkin isn't really Trump. He's just willing to pander to the Trumpian base. Terry also made a really bad gaffe about parents and education in schools.

Youngkin re-ran the Southern Strategy with CRT being the new racial dog whistle constantly being pumped out by Fox News in a year where the political environment is bad for Democrats (the party in power), all the while the main stream media covered him as if he was a Mitt Romney Republican. This allowed him to get the Trump Base out and win over white suburban women.

I'm sure the lesson that all the "smart folks" will draw from this is that if only progressives had voted for Manchin's highway bill, things would be different... but this was a state wide wipeout that was probably due to structural factors more than anything.

Expand full comment

I was very skeptical that a state would go plus ten Biden then elect a Republican. And I was wrong. I wish Republican voters were aware of how little respect their elected officials have for them. McAuliffe, Phil Murphy if he loses, neither will entertain the idea that their elections were rigged (nor, conversely, will their opponents in victory), because they respect their own voters enough to know they're not going to go for anything like that. Republicans know their voters well, and they're the same people who would send a televangelist a check for $1000 to cure grandma's cancer.

This has been bubbling up in the commentariat, but Democrats, from the voters to the elected, need to wake up to the authoritarian threat, and understand that the only way to stop a united authoritarian threat is with a united front of your own. Divide and conquer has been killing us for the last five years, and we have learned nothing. The only thing that seems to unite us is disgust over Trump, but with time, the memory fades, and when he runs again in 2024, will we still be disgusted enough? Or will be just be insufficiently excited about our own candidate and let the fascists have their way? Will we even remember in three years that they were fascists?

The culture war own-goals, the bickering over spending bills for which America has no enthusiasm while the house is burning, it needs to stop, or America will be lost.

Expand full comment

Here's something I posted this morning in a group I belong to over the Virginia race. I can pretty much guarantee that no one is looking at what happened in my hometown and making predictions about what it means, although one could easily read all kinds of positive news for Democrats into this story:

So – the news is full of doom and gloom because of Virginia, and prognosticating about what all that means. As usual, everyone - and especially Democrats – are focusing on national implications and not paying attention to the places where we actually live.

Meanwhile, in Cincinnati, 8 of 9 elected council members are Democrats. The lone Republican had been appointed to fill the remainder of the term of another Republican council member, who was one of three accused of corruption over the past couple of years (the other 2 were Dems). She, along with the other appointed Republican (who did *not* win a seat) are both council members I’ve interacted with and respect. They don’t follow the national model, and work well in collaboration with their fellow council members, no matter their party affiliation.

The new council includes 4 women and 5 men. Five of the nine are African-American.

The new elected mayor is Aftab Pureval, also a Democrat, whose family were South Asian immigrants, making him the first Asian-American mayor of Cincinnati - and, according to my local NPR station, the first Asian-American elected as mayor to *any* city in the Midwest). A Democrat won the race for Municipal Judge. He’s African-American.

For open seats on Cincinnati Public School Board, all 4 newly-elected members were Democrats. Three of the four are African American. The new Board will have 4 African Americans and 3 Caucasians in a city that skews about 50% white/42% black, and whose public school population is 62% black/24% white.

Terry McAuliffe faced both headwinds against his election and, in my opinion, a flawed strategy. He chose to focus on connecting Youngkin to Trump rather than on the local issues that make up the majority of concerns for local voters. In Cincinnati, I can’t think of one candidate – no matter the party, no matter the office – who did that. Everyone was laser-focused on the local issues the city’s residents shared their concerns about: public safety, affordable housing & economic development, transportation and especially traffic safety for pedestrians, and corruption.

The media really does a disservice to the many stories that don’t fit their national narrative. I suppose this is a natural consequence of the decimation of local news media in way too many places.

Expand full comment

Voters of both parties that voted for Biden in 2020 voted Youngkin in 2021. Donny Deutsch and Morning Joe had a chat along these lines recently: if the Repbubs run anyone (sane) other than Trump in 2024 they deliver a landslide. Youngkin's victory speech last night was very much garden variety politics about specific local issues - grocery tax, school choice, increased education budget and so on. He didn't mention Trump or fraud or conspiracies or even Covid. No chanting, no soaring rhetoric, no table jumping. It was a focused, pre-2015 conservative lift out of the muck from both sides this past half decade. The path seems obvious.

Expand full comment

Given our decisions in the voting booth, a fable:

A bird waited too long to migrate and was too cold to attempt flying that far. A poor woman found the shivering bird and put it into a fresh warm cow pie. The bird warmed by the cow pie, and nourished by corn and other seeds in the cow pie, popped it's head out and began to sing. A fox, alerted by the singing, snapped up and ate the bird.

Moral: It is not always your enemies that put you in poo, and it is not always your friends that get you out of it.

Expand full comment

The message, Message, Message Dems. You are losing on message. Period. It's just I, Tom, and Kim in the bleachers today. You are not telling the story of how a single white working dad needs food stamps to supplement his income. You are not telling the story of how the 3rd generation Mexican family in rural America sends their kid to a school that does not teach them how to Code a computer. So, in the void, they are getting "Joe Biden is a threat to America because he is setting up FEMA camps and outfitting old military facilities with coffins for the inevitable day when the vaccine drops millions dead 2 years from now".

Expand full comment

If Republicans, and Americans, are too dumb to see what is happening then it really doesn't matter. Whether it is CRT, inflation, or the caravan coming to kill us all -- there is always something that can be made to seem like the end of the world regardless if it is true or not or regardless if those in power can actually stop the problem they "care" so deeply about.

It seems like Americans are too lazy to contemplate how the direction towards authoritarianism is probably a little worse than spending issues, nanny state policies, government overreach on climate, etc. but I guess not. Most just like to not think about any of this and would rather have their "daddy" tell them what they should think about it. Well, come '22 and '24 "daddy" comes home and you get to live with the consequences or your actions. I don't mind, I will help drive those wanting and willing to vote Trump and Trumpism into power to the polls - they deserve to be heard and we deserve to get what is coming very soon.

Expand full comment

Charlie, this is the first time I've said this, but I'm disappointed in you. Not because you've written a piece that I dislike, but because you've written a piece without a conclusion. The question of 'why can't you beat these guys' has an answer, and it's not the answer anyone else seems to be offering, so I'll put it forth based on my best estimates.

The reason that Dems can't beat the GOP is because of messaging, pure and simple. No, this is not a 'if the dems could just tell the voters about their grand plans better, they'd rush to join them' explanation. What I mean is that the GOP has message discipline, pure and simple. They possess the ability to create issues from nothing, and then have everyone from the grassroots to the people on Fox to the people in congress hammer it home every possible moment of every possible day, over and over and over again. This is not a new thing either. The GOP did this with Obama's birth certificate. They've done it with anti-trans issues, they've done it with CRT, they've done it with caravans of migrants and a dozen other issues.

Our core problem is that the Democratic party acts like it's a coalition of parliamentary parties, like the Black caucus is distinct from the LGBTQ caucus, or they're different parties entirely. As a result, what we end up with is no message at all. This is not a liberal vs. moderate issue. Manchin et all possess no more message discipline than the Squad or Bernie. Part of this is liberal hubris. Part of this is because they can't understand why people fall for the basic messages of the GOP.

Turn the clock back to 2016 for a moment. Remember 'lock her up?' as a policy message, it's garbage. But as a message itself, it's brilliant. It's clear, memorable, and direct. It's a brand. It worked. Same with 'build the wall.' These are messages that are quick, easy, and memorable. In a world where most people do not pay attention to politics at all, easy to remember messages will always trump detailed policy explanations.

The truth is this: liberals always believe that what people want is facts. They want to know things. This is not true in the slightest. Most voters can't name all three branches of government. They don't care about politics at all, and have been raised on the idea that all politicians are the same. They are not ideologically attached to things as much as they personally attached through the various bonds that they've developed in their lives. And because of this, trying to explain that hey, we're making your life better is a pointless exercise.

Voters do not want facts. They want emotions. They want slogans and messages that fit into nice easy soundbites. That's always been the case, but it's moreso now.

Look, Youngkin is a guy who ran a campaign entirely on anti-CRT nonsense. He's going to take the position, he's going to start wanting to ban words and books and probably put a bunch of covid deniers in his cabinet. And the people aren't going to care. Because for the most part, the public has moved on from thinking about Covid the same way they've moved on from Afghanistan. They're not interested in this storyline anymore.

The biggest mistake that Biden has made thus far is not a policy one. It's that his wager was that what people hated was Trump's constant presence in our lives. This was false. What people hated, it turns out, was Trump himself, a character they didn't want to see any more of. He was Poochie, and no one wanted him around anymore. But that didn't mean they didn't want more of the show.

The truth of the matter is that Dems are trapped in 1998. This isn't surprising, because their leadership are all over the age of 70. Biden, Schumer, Pelosi are all extremely old. That's a problem. Because it's not 1998 anymore. And the biggest problem is that they're afraid to fight the culture war. They're afraid to develop a message and hammer it home at every possible opportunity.

In Virginia? A former governor who was a centrist and ran on kitchen table issues lost to a Trump endorsed figure who winks and nods at insurrectionists. In other parts of the country, liberals were soundly defeated. Again, it's not a liberal vs. centrist issue. It's a 'democrats don't have a message at all' issue.

Because lots of dems are foolishly thinking that what they need to do is stay above the culture war, pass legislation, and then go to voters and be like 'see how we made your life better?' and those same voters are going to come back with 'But CRT!' Because voters do not care about legislation and never have. The beltway media cares. But the actual voters do not.

What Dems need to do is fight the culture war. They need to build a messaging apparatus and they need to be hammering it home every single day on every single program. They need to make it clear the issue of something like CRT is that the GOP wants to control what your kid learns. They need to make clear that something like overturning Roe isn't about saving babies but about governing by bounty hunters.

Because, and this is important, if you don't fight the culture war, that doesn't mean there's not a war going on. To quote Avengers, 'we're not at war, captain. They are.'

One last thing. There's a real problem in the electorate right now. By which I mean that by and large, an uninterested electorate doesn't really care about the differences between the GOP and Dems. It only really thinks that both are incompetent, so just keep voting for whoever isn't in power. But one thing that was curious to me is that in places where there were voting things on the ballot, they almost all lost. Which means that the right to vote isn't actually as important to voters as you might imagine.

So I ask you to ponder something. What happens if the next insurrection comes, it succeeds, and most voters shrug and don't care? Because I am fairly certain that is going to be the outcome. It turns out that most voters do not particularly care about who is in charge, nor do they particularly care about how our government works or it's history. I suspect that by and large, our biggest challenge is not GOP versus Democrat, but the people versus their own disinterest.

Expand full comment

In 2020 people voted against Trump... they didn't vote for Biden, they didn't vote for the Dem agenda. In 2021 Trump was not on the ticket. McAuliffe is the same tired establishment Democrat--aren't there any new, non-progressive Democrats? Without baggage? Centrist view? Some pragmatism/realism? Some actual decent campaigning and rhetoric?

Try not being so woke, as a party. Try doing things in smaller steps--and things that you take credit for that fit an agenda that openly and pragmatically helps a majority of Americans IMMEDIATELY and OBVIOUSLY. Talk in simple terms. Be patriotic. Be generically moral and not woke moral. Co-opt some basic, positive Christianity (think parable of the sheep and goats).

You have to steal back some ground from the GoP in that regard. Make some inroads on THEIR territory. Build an actual governing majority and maintain it by patience action in line with what Americans actually want (rather than what they say they want when polled).

Expand full comment

Northam handled the blackface scandal well. He didn’t resign, and he went out and listened to Black voters and learned a lot. Virginia would not have abolished the death penalty or legalized marijuana without that experience

Expand full comment

Hi Charlie: I just enjoyed your podcast with Mona, but had to comment on the irony of you two rolling your eyes at Biden's long overdue infrastructure spending proposal and then commiserating about homes on Mona's street being filled with sewage while the county can't figure out why.

Expand full comment

One silver lining. Youngkin distanced himself from Trump in order to win.

Expand full comment

A lot of people blame the loss on McAuliffe for running a bad campaign. Certainly, the campaign could have been better and the school board comment was a huge gaffe, even if Republicans were distorting a bit what he actually said.) But here's the thing. McAuliffe ran only slightly behind the other statewide Virginia Democratic candidates who also lost. (Analysis is complicated somewhat because the Gov's race also featured a Libertarian candidate who received .7% of the vote.) McAuliffe ran near the Democratic baseline for Virginia in 2021. The trouble is that the Democratic baseline in Virginia was awful across the board, regardless of the campaign.

But it just wasn't just Virginia. The results in New Jersey (+16 for Biden in 2020) where the popular incumbent Democratic governor nearly lost his re-election bid further demonstrates that the problem wasn't individual campaigns, but the Democratic brand. (The NJ Governor's race was, wrongly, assumed to be non-competitive so virtually no quality polling was done.)

People are mad at the Democrats and they took it out on them by voting for Republicans in 2021 or staying home. And the anger is not just tied into Biden, but is across the board. The chief blame belongs to the House Progressives, aka the "Suicide Squad" which decided to deny the President of their party a huge win on the popular, bipartisan infrastructure bill by insisting that bill be tied to the much less popular social spending measure. The Suicide Squad could have just taken the infrastructure bill win and then worked for a compromise on the social spending measure that could get moderate Ds on board. But members of the SS were worried they wouldn't get as much "stuff" as they would if they held the infrastructure bill hostage. The attempt to blackmail more moderate Democrats to vote for something they had cold feet on by tying it to something that is popular in their districts was always an absurd, counterproductive strategy that tanked Biden's ratings and Democratic fortunes in the 2021 election.

Progressives think their pet issues in the social spending measure are highly popular. Great. So run those issues out there one at a time and let the members of Congress vote on them. Funny how they have no interest in doing that.

If the Dems are going to salvage 2022 and win the White House in 2024, Biden needs to kick the progressives in the rear and move strongly to the middle. Can you imagine how popular Biden would be if he governed as a pragmatic, centrist Democrat who approached issues in a thoughtful, fiscally responsible manner, like say Joe Manchin?

Expand full comment

I agree 100% progressives have a rural messaging problem. Also, they need to drop the word “socialism” forever (this isn’t great with hispanic voters) and frame everything as giving the workforce “capital” just like the kind businesses need to succeed.

The problem is most progressives are going to see McAuliffe as a politician of yesteryear, and will probably label him as too moderate. I have hope in politicians like Charles Booker in Kentucky. Listen to his interview on New Abnormal Pod. He has the right strategy and progressives need to WAKE THE F UP & LISTEN TO HIM. (Charlie, pretty please interview him!!!)

Also, I blame Sinema, but just because my hurts and I’m feeling petty.

Link to Charles Booker interview:


Expand full comment

Quick Hits #3’s 2nd point is ridiculous. Republicans get away with A LOT! America is in an insane situation because REPBULICANs did not hold Trump accountable. I don’t know what world Dombek and Sykes are living in but the last time I checked Trump is a violator of all of the norms and isn’t going anywhere. Trump has several credible allegations of sexual abuse, pressured Ukraine's leader to dig up damaging information on a political rival, inspired an insurrection and is an essential part of an ongoing coup just to name a FEW scandals Trump has gotten away with.

Trump isn’t the only R getting away with scandals. Seven Republicans who were present at the Jan. 6 "Stop the Steal" in DC rally won on Election Day. There are so many other examples as you know.

In addition, in case you do not remember correctly several Ds called on Northam’s resignation.



Expand full comment

Isn't this all further proof that we need a 3rd party (not the Greens)?

Expand full comment